This website uses cookies

Read our Privacy policy and Terms of use for more information.

The Economic Flaw of Hiking Rates During a Supply Crisis

My core economics thesis: using traditional interest rate hikes to fight supply-side, imported inflation is a fundamentally flawed policy.

Interest rates are a demand-side tool. They are designed to cool down an overheating economy by making borrowing expensive, which stops consumers from spending excess cash. However, our current inflation isn't driven by high local demand. As the BoB openly acknowledged, we are facing cost-push inflation driven by external supply shocks: the war in the Middle East, global fuel prices, supply chain disruptions, and local tariff hikes (transport and medical).

When a central bank raises rates in this context, it doesn't fix the broken supply chain or make global oil cheaper. It simply makes local borrowing more expensive, which stifles business expansion, kills job creation, and crushes consumer demand. You don't solve the underlying inflation, but you do trigger an unnecessary economic slow down and potential recession, leaving the economy suffering from two macroeconomic losses (inflation + stagnation = stagflation) instead of one (inflation).

The Policy Split: Hiking the MoPR while Freezing the PLR

Because the BoB clearly recognizes that raising consumer rates would crush an already fragile domestic economy (real GDP contracted in 2024 and 2025), they executed a massive policy "split."

They increased the Monetary Policy Rate (MoPR) from 3.5% to 5.5%, but issued a strict directive to commercial banks NOT to increase their Prime Lending Rates (PLRs).

  • Protecting Consumers (The PLR Freeze): By freezing the PLR, the BoB is ensuring that borrowing costs for local businesses and everyday consumers do not increase. This shields the domestic economy from the demand-killing effects of a traditional rate hike, avoiding the recession trap.

  • Defending the Currency (The MoPR Hike): So why hike the backend rate by a massive 200 basis points? To fix market liquidity and defend the Pula. The BoB explicitly stated this is a "recalibration" to strengthen the exchange rate parameter. By keeping the central bank rate competitive with global markets, they prevent the Pula from depreciating, which is critical, because a weak Pula would make imported oil and food exponentially more expensive.

Press Release - Monetary Policy Committee Decision 30 April 2026.pdf

Press Release - Monetary Policy Committee Decision 30 April 2026.pdf

304.29 KBPDF File

Commercial Bank Compliance and Widening Margins

While the BoB’s strategy is a pragmatic way to shield borrowers, the MPC statement revealed a major friction point. Commercial banks are quietly undermining the policy by widening their lending margins above the frozen PLR.

Essentially, banks are still finding backdoor ways to make borrowing more expensive. The BoB isn't letting this slide lightly, they warned that by Q4 2026, they will enforce strict Basel III capital requirements to penalize banks for deposit concentration risk if they continue to misalign with the central bank's policy posture.

Other Things Worth Noting

Beyond the interest rate split move, the MPC statement highlighted several other critical headwinds for the local economy:

GDP & The Diamond Slump: The domestic economy is operating below full capacity. Real GDP actually contracted by 0.7% in 2025 (an improvement from -2.8% in 2024), driven heavily by the diamond mining downturn. The projected 3.1% recovery for 2026 relies entirely on the success of non-mining diversification.

The "Big Three" Inflation Drivers: The BoB revised their peak inflation forecast from 5.1% up to a massive 11.1% for Q3 2026 (see attached infographic). This is driven almost entirely by three specific, recent local shocks: the March 28 domestic fuel hike, the April 1 public transport fare hike, and the April 1 medical aid premium hike.

Agricultural Risks: Adding more fuel to the fire, the January 2026 Foot and Mouth Disease outbreak is severely restricting livestock movement and slaughtering, presenting a serious upside risk to domestic food inflation.

Conclusion

The BoB is walking a tightrope. They are using the MoPR hike to defend the currency and fix backend liquidity, while using the PLR freeze to acknowledge that our inflation is supply-driven and that the domestic economy cannot survive a hit to consumer demand. It’s an economically sound maneuver, provided the commercial banks actually comply.

Disclaimer

This website and all materials contained herein are issued by Regal Capital Botswana (Pty) Ltd ("Regal Capital") for informational purposes only and do not constitute investment advice, a solicitation, or an offer to buy or sell any financial instruments. The content is general in nature and does not consider specific investment objectives, financial situations, or individual needs. While Regal Capital strives for accuracy, no representation or warranty, express or implied, is made regarding the completeness, reliability, or accuracy of the information. Any opinions or estimates reflect the author’s judgment as of the publication date and are subject to change without notice. Regal Capital, its affiliates, directors, employees, agents, or contractors shall not be liable for any direct, indirect, or consequential loss or damage resulting from the use of or reliance on this website. Users should seek independent financial advice before making any investment decisions.

All intellectual property rights in this website are proprietary to Regal Capital or authorized third-party sources. No content may be reproduced, distributed, or transmitted without prior written permission. Investing involves risks, including potential capital loss. Past performance is not indicative of future results, and investments in foreign currencies are subject to exchange rate fluctuations. The strategies or instruments mentioned may not be suitable for all investors.

By accessing research materials, users acknowledge that Regal Capital and its affiliates may hold positions in securities discussed. Research is provided “as is” without warranties of accuracy or completeness and should not be considered a recommendation or solicitation. Users are encouraged to conduct their own due diligence and consult financial, legal, or tax advisors. Regal Capital is not liable for any trading losses, lost profits, or other damages resulting from reliance on its research. Use of this website is governed by the laws of Botswana, and users agree to the jurisdiction of its courts for any disputes

Contact

For more information visit our website at http://www.regalcapital.org or contact email [email protected]

Reply

Avatar

or to participate

Keep Reading